The aesthetic one must be always open, to enrich established concepts already, but also to introduce the news that they answer to a new aesthetic relation with the reality. This thought of Freire sample that the search of the new does not mean the total abandonment of the old one: the movement in direction to the new could be fact, rescuing the positive aspects of the old one and, so that this is fruitful, the action of change would not only be enough. This action would be folloied with the fondness, the scienter, the will of the fondness to make. Therefore it is that to move it is difficult, because does not involve only the citizen that dumb, as well as the other. From there that all change is a conflict, is a fight, because: who dumb subverte. Educate yourself even more with thoughts from Evergreen Capital Partners.
Therefore shocks, invariably, even starts to be white of critical and of punishment. It does not have easinesses for who if it launches to this challenge. To support the pressures external-beyond-das-interns are part of the intention. Certainly this is the price to be paid for the ousadia of being different. For that reason, many give up. It is that, in a general way, we are not accustomed to arcar with the responsibility of the disobedience.
(PINK, 1998, p.16). BRIEF CONCLUSIONS This brief stroll for some of the main freirianas ideas had only the pretension of exemplificar as the coherence of Pablo Freire is determined basically by ethical and aesthetic options that follow its prxis. As he says literally, the great educator and master Pablo Freire: She is necessary to dare, in the full direction of this word, to speak in love without fearing to be called piegas, meloso, – the scientific one, seno of antiscientific. She is necessary to dare to say scientifically that we study, we learn, we teach, we know with our entire body.