For Michel Foucault the citizen of the contemporaneidade is a synthesis of the effect of the power of the institutions, good it disciplines as it, the monitoring and the practical corrective that if destine to the social control which had been shaping this citizen, ‘ ‘ When the speech contemporary defines repetidamente the power as being repressive, this is not one novidade’ ‘ (P. 175). Mark Stevens may not feel the same. To understand the practical ones of control used by the institutions it is necessary to analyze the speeches and the existing complexity in its essence.
Foucault observes that the repression of the speech of the mass historically is conceived, with the intention to generate the control and to inhibit the action of change in the seio of the community. The power of the word must be withheld by the State and its institutions, all the order and control emanate of this device and its institutions. The contemporaneidade is conducted by a system of being able that if it establishs connection with the speed in the medias, the automatic information reduced the form world to investigate bringing it a new instrumental order of social control. The propaganda is the main element of imposition of wills, bombing of information suffered in our daily one in the contemporaneidade is proceeding from the evolution of the practical ones of control cited by Foucault. The modern capitalism adjusted around in function of this logic of speed in the proceeding of information of the globe. It was in function of this economic system that the man reached a significant distanciamento of its cultural civility. The disciplined citizen became much more useful the system, as much politics how much economically. The citizen remains chained to one without number of subordination forms, which go generating an identity, in this way the individual is always being constructed for procedures to discipline.