Evolution Of Psychological Science

The history of the construction of Psychology is on, at each historical moment, to the requirements of knowledge of the humanity, to the too much areas of the human knowledge and to the new challenges placed for the economic and social reality and the insacivel necessity of the man to understand itself exactly. Psychology enters the Greeks the history of the human thought has a golden moment in the Antiquity, between the Greeks, particularly in the period of 700 B.C. until the domination Roman, to the eves of the Christian age. It is between the Greek philosophers whom the first attempt appears systemize a Psychology. The proper term psychology comes of the Greek psych (soul), and of logos (reason), therefore psychology means ' ' study of alma' '. The philosophers daily pay-socrticos were worried in defining the relation of the man with the world through the perception. He had an opposition enters the idealists (the idea forms the world) and the materialists (the substance that forms the world already is given stops perception). Scrates claimed that the main characteristic human being was the reason.

When defining reason peculiarity of the man or as essence, it opened a way that very would be explored by Psychology. Plato looked for to define one ' ' lugar' ' for reason in our proper body. It defined this place as being the head, where if it finds the soul of the man. When somebody died, the substance (the body) disappeared, but the soul was free to occupy another body. Aristotle was innovative or claims that the soul and the body could not be dissociados. For it, psych would be the active principle of the life. Everything what it grows, if reproduces and if it feeds possesss its proper soul. Of this form the vegetables, the animals and the men would have soul. The first ones would have a vegetative soul, the seconds also and still the sensitive soul.

For Demon

What it confers your teaching activity, based in its values, as it is placed in the world, its to know, you distress, desires, and the direction that is to be professor in its life, this next to its relations with other professors and other institutions. To be actor and author of its identity seems to express, or better, to load all the abrangncia that involves the being professor. In this dynamic context, sped up that the world if presents, the professor has a giant challenge to construct and to keep its identity. For Demon (2004), the profession of the professor will be each valued time more, in function of the intensive society of the knowledge and also which had to the right to learn. An encouraging, important affirmation for the professional professor.

But that professional professor? That one that if really identifies as professor? That one that another one identity. As Demon (2004), all the professions suffer incontido consuming, if mainly inserted in the disrupitiva dynamics of the knowledge. the professor in special is whitened by this consuming. But at the same time it is the profession most promising, therefore the learning demand will go to increase, is a necessity of the society and thus the essential educator will be part for the future of the same one. Ahead of the reflection explored for Demon, one thinks that the professional, when making its choice for the docncia, will have to watch over for its> identity, to construct it continuously inside of a professor proposal personal who learns that he is in tune with the context which is inserted. Made use to breach with the traditional reproduction of the knowledge. to think about strategies as educator of this future society.